Help: Nominating an article for cleanup or deletion

From open-dictionary.com - the free dictionary.

Explanation

• Give a brief reason for your nomination of the article for cleanup or deletion.
• Thinking deeply before listing an article here is not discouraged, but it is definitely not a requirement either. Most comments here are first impressions, not considered analyses of an article.
• Limit comments to a few words only; verbose comments will be edited for brevity!
• Be specific. Saying "needs work" is not enough.

Terms to use

keep - fine - nonsense - OK now? - unimproved - insufficient - meta - non-dictionary - stubified - substub - expand - nonexistent - obscure - idiosyncratic - advert - selfpromotion - ungrammatic - silly - joke - repeat - link - chatty - rant - POV - NPOV - copyvio (=copyright violation) - brilliant - obscenity - blog - vanity page...

Markup Conventions

• Begin your comments with a "-" to separate it from the previous one, but:
  • If you have made or are reporting a change to the page in question, Use a "+" instead (e.g. "+ fixed the first paragraph", "+ deleted" or "+ stubbified")
• The comment "delete" or "RFD" is a vote to move this page to Wiktionary:Requests for deletion, not to delete it immediately. Please list such entries in bold.
• If you think an article needs it, write "delete immediately".
• Please sign your entry.

Edit conflicts can be mitigated by copying your own text before you submit it, so you can paste and repost it quickly.